What Does the Slimline® TAC’s Increased Flow-by Area Actually Look Like?

A CNC machine operator machining parts for the Slimline Tubing Anchor Catcher

Sometimes benefits are a little tough to visualize. If you’re in the market for a new truck, it’s one thing to read about a vehicle with a 40,000-pound towing capacity. It’s something quite different to see that truck hauling 20 tons of rock and steel up a grade on the way to a jobsite. More often than not, seeing is believing.

A Flow-by Area Comparison

In the case of the Slimline® Tubing Anchor Catcher (TAC), documenting the increased annular area around the TAC, when compared to a Baker B2-style (standard) anchor, isn’t as compelling as seeing it in action. The Slimline® offers an increased flow-by capacity of up to 245%. That distinction can best be seen in a side-by-side comparison:

A comparison of the flow-by area around a standard B2 anchor in casing versus the Slimline TAC in casing
The Slimline® (left) provides significantly more annular flow-by area than the standard anchor (right).

Both photos feature a 5.5” TAC within 17 ppf casing. The Slimline® on the left shows a much wider annular area. That increased flow-by area is what allows the Slimline® to reduce the occurrence of gas locking in sucker rod pump systems, as well as limit the number of stuck anchors. Gas can more easily flow up and around the Slimline®, while sand and sediment can fall past the anchor without cementing it in place.

One engineer with a large production company operating in the Southern United States described it this way: “Sand was a frequent problem in many of our wells. It would fall on top of a standard TAC and cement the anchor in place. After switching to the Slimline, that problem all but disappeared.”

Download a Computational Fluid Dynamics Report comparing the Slimline® TAC with a standard B2 anchor.

Get the Report

A Closer Look

These next photos make the difference clearer with the addition of a tape measure. The 5.5” Slimline® offers a flow-by OD of 3.75 inches, compared to 4.50 inches with the standard TAC. In addition to minimizing downhole problems with gas and sand, that increased flow-by capacity minimizes the pressure drops and turbulent flow that precipitate out scale, iron sulfide, and paraffin.

A tape measure highlights the difference in flow-by area between the Slimline TAC and a standard B2 anchor
The tape measure highlights the difference in flow-by area between the Slimline® (left) and the standard anchor (right).

Through almost 20 years of experience, we’ve found very few instances where a Slimline® TAC couldn’t benefit most downhole production strings. However, we offer a range of downhole tubing anchor solutions to be compatible with your downhole assembly, including standard (Baker B2 style) and quarter-turn anchors, as well as the patented Slimline® and Slimline® QuickSet™. For more information about any of these solutions, contact the TechTAC® team today.

Subscribe to the TechTAC® Newsletter to get more articles like this one delivered to your email inbox every month.

Sign Up Now

Like this post? Spread the word.

TECHTAC® BLOG

Featured Posts

Make sure you don't miss any of these!

January 27, 2025

Oil Well Efficiency: Lower Lifting Costs and Boost Productivity from Your Existing Wells

“[S]oftening oil prices have eroded profits and cash flows since early 2023…. However, all 15 companies in the peer group remained... View More
June 26, 2024

Gas Locking in Oil Wells: Causes, Consequences and Solutions

Gas locking in oil wells is a common challenge that can have a significant impact on overall well production. In this article, we will... View More
September 12, 2023

The High Cost and Impact of a Stuck Tubing Anchor Catcher in an Oil Well

Oil drilling is a complex and costly process, with numerous challenges and risks involved. One of the potential problems that can occur... View More